ENIL Calls for the Structural Funds to Support Independent Living

The European Network on Independent Living (ENIL) joins the European Expert Group on Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care (EEG) in calling upon the Council of the EU and the European Parliament to uphold the ex ante conditionalities relevant to the Structural Funds’ support of community-based alternatives to institutional care for children, persons with disabilities- including intellectual or psychosocial disabilities – and older persons.

 

  The EEG – whose members are nine European non governmental organisations active in the field of social inclusion, non discrimination and fundamental rights, the European Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and UNICEF – is advocating for Structural Funds to facilitate the social inclusion of children, persons with disabilities – including intellectual or psycosocial disabilities – and older persons, and their access to quality social and health care services in the community, as an alternative to the care provided in segregating residential settings.

 

  For this reason, the EEG has welcomed the inclusion of “transition from institutional to community-based care” within the scope of the European Commission proposals for the new EU cohesion policy 2014-2020. In particular, we have welcomed the thematic ex ante conditionality regarding the objective “promoting social inclusion and combating poverty”, which provides that the national strategies for poverty reduction should include measures for the shift from residential to community based care; as well as the general ex ante conditionality requiring the effective implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

  We regret that these two important elements of the ex ante conditionalities have been removed in the compromise text agreed by the Council on 24 April 2012 within the framework of its partial general approach on the EU new cohesion policy .

  During the current and past Structural Funds programming periods it has been shown that an appropriate combined use of the ERDF and the ESF can play an important role in supporting Member States’ efforts in moving from institutional to community-based care (a process also known as “deinstitutionalisation”). However, we believe it is crucial that such investments should be planned and implemented in the context of Member States’ structural and strategic reforms, and in line with international human rights standards.

  Therefore, we call upon the Council and the European Parliament to do the following:

1.  Under the thematic ex ante conditionalities of the objective “promoting social inclusion and combating poverty”, uphold the inclusion of “measures for the shift from residential to community-based care” in the national strategic policy frameworks to tackle poverty and social exclusion. The social inclusion objectives of Europe 2020, which include eradicating child poverty, promoting the active inclusion of the most vulnerable groups, providing decent housing for everyone and overcoming all forms of discrimination, cannot be achieved if the Member States fail to strategically address the situation of over 1,2 million Europeans who live in long-stay residential institutions, segregated from the rest of society.

2.  Uphold the general ex ante conditionality requiring the existence of a mechanism which ensures effective implementation and application of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Article 19 of the Convention requires the EU and its Member States to take all appropriate measures to ensure that persons with disabilities can live their lives independently, included in the community. We believe that the existence of the proposed mechanism would help Member States and the European Union comply with this international obligation, by ensuring that all Structural Funds investments in care infrastructure and services promote the enjoyment of fundamental rights and social inclusion of persons with disabilities.

Share this article

  • Add to favorites
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS

UK is Breaching Human Rights of Disabled, UN told

Source: Stephen Naysmith – Herald Scotland

A SCOTTISH campaigner will this morning (2nd April 2012) tell the Human Rights Council of the UN that the UK Government is in breach of its human rights obligations to disabled people.

In Geneva today, Dr Pauline Nolan, Policy Officer for Inclusion Scotland, will submit evidence to a preliminary hearing ahead of a planned review of the human rights record of 14 states, including the UK.

On behalf of the Campaign for A Fair Society – a coalition of more than 70 Scottish charities – Dr Nolan will warn the cumulative impact of welfare reform and cuts to benefits affecting disabled people will mean their ability to live a full life is impaired. In particular, she will argue that welfare changes undermine their right to be included in the community.

Click here to read more.. »

Share this article

  • Add to favorites
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS

Irish MEP’s Discuss European Union Austerity Measures

On the 9th February 2012 ENIL and the parliamentary group GUE/NGL held a hearing in the European Parliament entitled ‘Defend the right of Independent Living – How the EU’s austerity policy is undermining the lives of people with disabilities’.

Before the hearing I met up with two Irish Members of the European Parliament, Mairead McGuinness and Paul Murphy. We discussed the impact of the austerity measures on the lives people with disabilities and the future implications of these measures.

Paul Murphy, MEP was moderator of the second panel which focused on ‘The threat of cuts to the rights of persons with disabilities at the European Level’. Paul Murphy is a member of the Socialist Party in Ireland and is part of the GUE/NGL parliamentary group. This hearing was his first introduction into the area of disability. Paul Murphy said that for him “this is the start of the process of becoming more active in the whole area of disability”.  Mairead McGuinness, MEP is a member of the political party Fine Gael in Ireland and is part of the European Peoples Party (EPP) parliamentary group. She has a long standing interest in disability issues. She supports agencies that work on the ground in EU countries to achieve deinstitutionalisation by raising the issue in the European Parliament.

Peter Lambreghts, ENIL and Onafhankelijk Leven and Paul Murphy,MEP

One of the first issues that I discussed with Paul Murphy was how Europe’s austerity measures could impact on one of the main objectives of the Disability Action Plan (DAP), which is to ‘make equal opportunities for disabled people a reality’. Paul Murphy described how the gap between people’s aspirations and reality is growing as a result of the current financial crisis.  “Unfortunately, the impact of the actions of the Commission and the local government is quite vast and with the crisis the gap has grown even bigger.” He described the situation in Ireland and how those that are most affected by the crisis are moving further away from their hopes.

Click here to read more.. »

Share this article

  • Add to favorites
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS

Edward Scissorhands … the cuts in Italy

He couldn’t have done worse than this. The BTP-Bund spread going up and down, the European Central Bank, a crisis in welfare: explain it how you want but at the end of the day there is a scapegoat that has always been used and that’s the weak. In the middle of this, disabled people are to be kept even further away from the rest of society but nevertheless under firm control. We are seen as a problem that has to be increasingly managed as the population ages. This year the situation is even worse, with cuts pushed through based on the invented notion of “fake invalids”.  In effect what we are being told is, sorry, there is a crisis and there is no money left for you. So many human rights written so very nicely but not applied at all. As far as the European Union is concerned the welfare state is not a priority and isn’t on the agenda.

Then Edward moves his scissors. In Italy this has been called the “Save Italy” decree. In effect it is virtually wiping out the social care system. In the South of Italy there was little social care support before the decree, and even less remains now. In the north of Italy there was little and now there will be nothing. For example in Piedmont, by 2004, we had managed to break down the barrier that had traditionally stopped disabled people from accessing a PA allowance and we secured the introduction of a regional decree with a fund of 1 million Euros for 50 disabled people with high levels of support need. By 2011 there were 178 disabled people with personal budgets totaling 2.7 million Euros, protected by special resolution and under the constant monitoring of disabled people’s organisations such as Consequor and FISH. Click here to read more.. »

Share this article

  • Add to favorites
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS

ENIL on the Joint Committee on Human Rights Report on Independent Living and UNCRDP

Rights of disabled people may be at risk, says Human Rights Committee 

The disability movement/Independent Living movement of the UK is very pleased about the outcome of this report. It was exactly what we needed after almost two years of challenging the government on how the cuts and austerity measures were affecting disabled people’s ability to live independently.

The report is highly critical of the government’s measures in cutting back services, and the ILF (Independent Living Fund) which is putting disabled people at severe risk for the future.

This is by far the most comprehensive critique of an EU Member State policies which are affecting disabled people severely. No other governmental level report has come out in Europe highlighting the impact the austerity measures are having on Independent Living. This report can be very useful for the Independent Living movement throughout Europe in challenging their current austerity policies.

The question is whether the UK government will take this seriously or just ignore it. Click here to read more.. »

Share this article

  • Add to favorites
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS

Reprint: Disabled people have come so far – don’t undo all the progress

The UK is at risk of breaching international obligations to disabled people, so I’m proud to help safeguard independence

The joint select committee on human rights reports today on its 12-month inquiry into disabled people’s right to independent living. Photograph: Janine Wiedel Photolibrary/Alamy

As a severely disabled person, I am reminded every day of the tremendous progress made over the past 30 years in the UK to enable disabled people to become active citizens. Autonomy and freedom would not have been part of my vocabulary half a century ago. I might have been reliant upon my family for support, with the prospect of being put into an institution when they could no longer cope.

Instead, at 52, I am an independent crossbench peer and member of the joint committee on human rights (JCHR), which reports this week on its 12-month inquiry into disabled people’s right to independent living.

Since leaving university I have had the privilege of being involved in helping develop the complex weave of legislation and public policy necessary for disabled people to live in, and be part of, their community.

Keeping millions of disabled people inactive and dependent is costly, from a financial and moral point of view. I have witnessed disabled people raise families, work or simply be more cost-effective by keeping healthy and taking greater control over their personal care. It’s not been perfect. But by many standards, we were ahead of the game compared with much of Europe.

And now decades of positive progress are at risk of being reversed as economic austerity is used as justification for denying independence.

That is why I am so pleased to be part of the strong and unambiguous stand taken by the JCHR in publishing its report. We listened to a whole range of expert witnesses and took into account extensive research and consultation, looked at the context of the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (UNCRPD), which was ratified by the UK in 2009.

Although I feel I have the right to independent living, the legislative and policy framework simply isn’t in place to make it a right; and what there is, is in danger of disappearing fast.

If my local authority cuts my care package or demands I transfer to NHS care (because they regard using a ventilator as the trigger for health services), I lose control of my life. I might have to leave parliament, or give up work altogether (because I need social care direct payments to do everything, from eating a sandwich to delivering a speech). I am only a few bureaucratic decisions away from returning to the inequality I endured at 18. It wouldn’t take long to transform all my relationships with my colleagues, partner, family, friends into one which gives little or nothing to anyone. Everyone loses.

The fact that all this could happen without my consent hangs over me and thousands of others. That is why I am so glad the JCHR report recognises and recommends the need for freestanding legislation to protect the right to independent living in UK law.

The report addresses recent government and local authority measures and austerity reforms that impact upon independent living for disabled people; such as reforms to disability living allowance and housing benefit, closure of the Independent Living Fund and restricting eligibility for social care to “critical or substantial” needs only.

The JCHR found no tangible evidence of the government giving due consideration to the UK’s obligations under the UNCRPD during this critical reforming time.

This lack of regard to the convention, coupled with the potentially retrogressive impact of these reforms, risks placing the UK in breach of its international obligations. This report is so timely. It sets out the risks to progress on independent living and makes sensible, achievable recommendations.

The UK’s international reputation in public policy and legislation which places more power in the hands of disabled people to assume control over their own lives, and to be included in all areas of life, is clearly in jeopardy.

Independent living has never made more sense. The government must heed the JCHR report and act fast. Otherwise history will repeat itself – the next generation of disabled people should not have fewer rights than I’ve had.

Share this article

  • Add to favorites
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS

U.K.: Rights of disabled people may be at risk, says Human Rights Committee

JOINT COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS

PRESS NOTICE

No 87, Session 2010-12, 27 February 2012 

 

The Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) today publishes its Report on the implementation of the right of disabled people to independent living in the context of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) which was ratified by the UK in 2009. The Report draws attention to a number of significant human rights issues, including:

 

·         the need for freestanding legislation to protect the right to independent living in UK law,

·         the effect of current reforms to benefits and services on the ability of disabled people to enjoy independent living,

·         the role played by the UNCRPD in policy development and decision making at all levels of government,

·         the use of equality impact assessments,

·         the effects of devolution on implementation of the UNCRPD, and

·         hate crime

 

The right to independent living does not exist as a freestanding right in UK law. Although it is protected and promoted to some extent by a matrix of rights, the Committee believes that this is not enough. It argues that the Government and other interested parties should immediately assess the need for, and feasibility of, legislation to establish independent living as a freestanding right. In addition, the Committee concludes that the UNCRPD is hard law, not soft law, and that the Government should fulfil their obligations under the Convention on that basis, and counter any public perception that it is soft law.

 

The Committee finds that:

 

·         reforms to benefits and services risk leaving disabled people without the support they need to live independently;

·         restrictions in local authority eligibility criteria for social care support, the replacement of the Disability Living Allowance with Personal Independence Payment, the closure of the Independent Living Fund and changes to housing benefit risk interacting in a particularly harmful way for disabled people;

·         some people fear that the cumulative impact of these changes will force them out of their homes and local communities and into residential care.

 

It also finds that:

 

·         the Government had not conducted an assessment of the cumulative impact of current reforms on disabled people. The Report urges them do so, and to report on the extent to which these reforms are enabling them and local authorities to comply with their obligations under the UNCRPD.

 

·         the UNCRPD did not appear to have played a significant role in the development of policy and legislation, as is required by the Convention. The Committee therefore argues that the Government should make a commitment to Parliament that they will give due consideration to the articles of the Convention when making legislation.

 

Further, the Committee deprecates changes to the duties of public authorities in England under the Equality Act 2010, which no longer require the production of equality impact assessments of changes in policy, nor the involvement of disabled people in developing policies which will affect them.

 

The Committee finds variations in the manner in which the devolved administrations have implemented the Convention, and uncertainty as to the role the UK Government should play in ensuring implementation. The Report notes with disappointment the lack of a strategy in Northern Ireland to promote independent living and reminds the UK Government to acknowledge their responsibility to ensure implementation.

 

The Committee also considers a range of other issues relating to independent living. It recommends that the Government should take further action to ensure that assessments for care needs are portable across the country in order to ensure disabled people’s right to choose their place of residence. It also expresses concern over a growing incidence of hate crime against disabled people and urges the Government take action to foster respect for the rights and dignity of disabled people.

 

 

Dr Hywel Francis MP, Chair of the Committee, said: “We are concerned to learn that the right of disabled people to independent living may be at risk through the cumulative impact of current reforms. Even though the UK ratified the UNCPRD in 2009 with cross-party support, the Government is unable to demonstrate that sufficient regard has been paid to the Convention in the development of policy with direct relevance to the lives of disabled people. The right to independent living in UK law may need to be strengthened further, and we call on the Government and other interested organisations to consider the need for a freestanding right to independent living in UK law.”

 

 

The members of the Committee Are:

Rehman Chishti MP (Conservative Gillingham and Rainham)
Baroness Berridge (Conservative)
Mike Crockart MP (Liberal Democrat Edinburgh West)
Lord Bowness (Conservative)
Dr Hywel Francis MP (Labour Aberavon) (Chair)
Baroness Campbell of Surbiton (Cross-Bencher)
Mr Dominic Raab MP (Conservative Esher and Walton)
Lord Dubs (Labour)
Mr Virendra Sharma MP (Labour Ealing Southall)
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Mr Richard Shepherd MP (Conservative Aldridge-Brownhills)
Lord Morris of Handsworth (Labour)

 

Clerks to the Committee:

Mike Hennessy (House of Commons) 020 7219 2797 John Turner (House of Lords) 020 7219 6772

Enquiries: 020 7219 2467        Fax: 020 7219 8393        E-mail: jchr@parliament.uk

Homepage: http://www.parliament.uk/jchr
Media Inquiries:  Liz Parratt: 07917 488978.

Share this article

  • Add to favorites
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS

DPAC: Letter warns Government that Scrapping ILF would ‘wreck lives’

All photos © 2012 Pete Riches

Campaigners have handed the government a letter signed by hundreds of user-led organisations and disabled activists, in an effort to save the Independent Living Fund (ILF).

The letter, written by the campaign group Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), warns that scrapping ILF would “wreck disabled people’s lives” and push them into residential institutions rather than allowing them to live independently in the community. Click here to read more.. »

Share this article

  • Add to favorites
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS

Spotlight: Hearing in the European Parliament: “Defend the Right of Independent Living – How the EU’s austerity policy is undermining the lives of people with disabilities.”

On the 9th February 2012 ENIL and the European parliamentary group GUE/NGL (European United Left/Nordic Green Left) held a hearing in the European Parliament. The purpose of this hearing was to show from a number of perspectives how people with disabilities are being negatively affected by the EU current austerity policies. This is the first time that ENIL has held a hearing in the European Parliament. ENIL presented its ‘Proposal for a European Parliament Resolution’ on the effect of the cuts. The hearing was received positively in the European Parliament and three Members of the Parliament participated in the hearing, Kartika Liotard, MEP, Netherlands, Cecilia Wikstrom, MEP, Sweden and Paul Murphy, MEP, Ireland. The hearing was streamed live and there was up to two hundred people watching online throughout the hearing, with approximately eighty people in the Parliament itself.

The hearing began on a optimistic tone with MEP Cecilia Wikstrom’s opening address in which she made it clear that the although the financial climate is affecting every faction of society that hope is necessary at this time.

Panel 1: Understanding the impact of austerity measures on persons with disabilities

The hearing was in two parts with two different panels. Understanding the impact of the austerity measures on persons with disabilities was the focus of the first panel. Throughout this first panel, four themes emerged; (a) disability and policy, (b) de-institutionalisation, (c) disability and the media and (d) individual accounts that were shared.

(a)   Disability and Policy: Since the financial crisis there has been an impact on the way in which policy has been implemented, interpreted and devised. One of the most important issues raised by Prof. Alan Roulstone (Expert on global and European disability policy)  was that short term cuts often ignore the long term benefits. These policy decisions do not just have economical effect, but social and political effects. John Evans OBE ( Advisory Board member of ENIL)  noted that throughout this financial crisis, it is the welfare systems that have been hit hardest and further reductions would increase poverty. He pointed out that many of these cuts have been made without any dialogue between governments and those whose benefits they are cutting. John Evans further argued, Independent Living has positively changed people’s lives, however some people are now struggling to survive. Click here to read more.. »

Share this article

  • Add to favorites
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS

Disability watchdog: Update on current events in Hungary

“We would like to make you aware of current concerns that disabled people in Hungary are faced with. Recently the Hungarian Government changed the whole disability pension system, which will be a lot worse than the previous system especially for disabled people. The biggest changes are connected to the rights that arise from the pension system. According to the new system the 1st and 2nd disability groups will remain unchanged, but persons belonging to the 3rd group will be reviewed and according to the decision of the reviewing committee some of them will no longer receive the pension as they did according to the old system. Those who fall out of the 3rd disability group under this new system will be obliged to take part in a rehabilitation programme at the end of which it is intended that they find employment in the labour market. However considering the current situation even non-disabled well-trained persons with university degrees can’t find employment as at the present time in Hungary it is almost impossible to find employment, similar to what is happening in the rest of Europe.

 

In addition to that there has also been the introduction of new regulations for people with serious physical disabilities obtaining a new car. These regulations effectively mean that the individuals who the car is for will not be able to use it themselves because it will only be possible to get small cars that are not big enough to take wheelchairs. Furthermore the cars will not be adapted or automatic and the monthly rate to obtain a car is very high.

 

In the case of obtaining a used car (second hand car), the amount of co-financing was raised to 2000 EUR, however this amount must represent at least 60% of the full price with the other 40% paid by the applicant.

 

Changes in repairing (servicing) of technical devices have also been introduced together with the new disability pension system. According to this new system for example:

For repairing a wheelchair, the travel costs for the mechanic to get to the person and the wheelchair that needs to be repaired, will have to be paid by the user as the Health Insurance system will no longer cover such expenses. In practice this new system will mean that if someone has a scooter financed by the Health Insurance Company, that person will not be able to claim for a wheelchair from the Health Insurance Company; although for many of us this is necessary in addition to a scooter to maintain our independent living.”

Share this article

  • Add to favorites
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS