Alt text: Wide webinar banner for the Global Coalition on Deinstitutionalization, GC-DI. The background is light beige with decorative patterned borders at the top and bottom. The top centre text reads “Global Coalition on Deinstitutionalization (GC-DI)”. Below it is a row of partner logos, including Disability Rights International, Centre for Human Rights, Validity, International Disability Alliance, Inclusion International, TCI, and ENIL. The main title reads: “How to use International Complaints to Challenge Institutionalization under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)”. At the bottom, text reads: “Date: May 28, 2026, Thursday | Time: 03:00 PM - 5:00 PM CET | on Zoom.”

Date: Thursday, 28 May 2026
Time: 15:00 – 17:00 CET
Location: Online via Zoom
Register: https://us06web.zoom.us/…/reg…/WN_31ofw6ykS6ekTTcUJ9-nHg


Accessibility: Captioning, International Sign Language and Mandarin interpretation will be provided.


Institutionalization continues to impact the lives, autonomy, legal capacity and community inclusion of persons with disabilities across the world.


This webinar will explore how international complaints mechanisms under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) can be used as tools for advocacy, accountability and systemic change towards deinstitutionalization and community living.


The session will bring together disability rights advocates, Organisations of Persons with Disabilities, legal experts and civil society representatives to discuss practical pathways for engaging with CRPD mechanisms and strengthening rights-based advocacy efforts at national, regional and global levels.


The webinar will discuss different procedures, complaints and review pathways under the CRPD that can be used to challenge institutionalization and advance deinstitutionalization advocacy. Through examples from inquiries, individual communications, requests for further information, follow-up processes and domestic CRPD-like review mechanisms, the session will highlight how OPDs, civil society actors and advocates have used these mechanisms in practice, what opportunities they create, and how their outcomes can support national-level advocacy for independent living in the community and freedom from institutionalization and coercive practices.


We are honoured to organise this discussion together with partners from the Global Coalition on Deinstitutionalization (GC-DI), including the International Disability Alliance, Inclusion International, ENIL, Disability Rights International, the Centre for Human Rights, and Validity Foundation.


Agenda


TimeTopicPresenter
15:00 – 15:10Welcome and introductionsRicha Sharma, Transforming Communities for Inclusion
15:10 – 15:15Housekeeping guidelinesSabeeha Majid, University of Pretoria
15:15 – 15:25Overview of CRPD mechanisms for challenging institutionalizationMirriam Nthenge, International Disability Alliance
15:25 – 15:30How the webinar will flowModerator
15:30 – 15:40Using the inquiry procedure: lessons from MexicoDisability Rights International
15:40 – 15:50Using the inquiry procedure: lessons from the UKEuropean Network on Independent Living
15:50 – 16:00Using the inquiry procedure: lessons from HungarySándor Gurbai, Validity Foundation
16:00 – 16:10Article 36(1): requesting further information from StatesDorothy Gould, Liberation, UK
16:10 – 16:20Individual communications: case example from Australia/SlovakiaValidity Foundation
16:20 – 16:30Overview of domestic CRPD-like review mechanisms for non-UN member StatesNagase Osamu, Inclusion International
16:30 – 16:40OPD experience of using domestic CRPD-like review for deinstitutionalization advocacyWang Shiou-Wu, Taiwan Mad Alliance
16:40 – 16:55Questions and discussionModerator with GC-DI support
16:55 – 17:00Closing remarks and wrap-up

About the webinar


The webinar will focus on how CRPD procedures and related review mechanisms can be used to challenge institutionalization and strengthen advocacy for deinstitutionalization.


Speakers will discuss:


• how OPDs, advocates and civil society groups can use CRPD procedures to challenge institutionalization
• how inquiry procedures have been used in Mexico, the UK and Hungary
• how Article 36(1) can help raise concerns with the CRPD Committee
• what individual communications can show about challenging institutionalization
• why domestic CRPD-like review mechanisms matter for non-UN member States
• how OPDs have used review processes to advocate for deinstitutionalization


Register here: https://us06web.zoom.us/…/reg…/WN_31ofw6ykS6ekTTcUJ9-nHg